My father always promised that one day, when things got better, and we were no longer homeless, he would take us to Disney World. I remember, as a teenager driving to Orlando with my mother; we were going to hear a prophet speak. There we were, mere minutes away from the most magical place on earth. But instead of visiting the mouse, we were placing dollar bills in offering plates hoping that the trickle-down economics of the prosperity gospel might finally save us from our plight.
As we drove away, I looked up at the Mickey-shaped power lines and imagined how wonderful it would be to no longer be poor. My mother looked over at me, seeing my longing, and said, “someday.” I guess she meant once we were rewarded “a hundredfold” for the tuppence we had given to the Lord, aka the prophets.
Unholy Sh+t: An Irreverent Bible Study
4th Sunday of Ordinary Time
Today’s reading: Matthew 5:1–12
Jesus pulled up to the crowd in his brand new 33AD BMW town car. Peter ran around back and opened the door for him. “What’s the crowd like?” Jesus asked, pulling his designer sunglasses off coolly. “We counted 5000 men, sir.” The Mount Auditorium was packed to the brim, and just before Jesus took to the stage, he dusted off his Gucci shoes and said to Peter, “make sure we are getting a cut from the fish stick sales! We are bringing Gawwwd tonight!”
Sike!
None of that happened because Jesus was homeless and lived a simple life (Matthew 8:20). But if you grew up around the prosperity gospel, you’ve probably heard preachers just like that. I know I did. Just drop another dollar in the offering plate, and you too might be lucky enough to be blessed with riches beyond your wildest imagination. God is basically the big slot machine in the sky! There is just one minor little hiccup to this theology: Jesus.
During the sermon on the mount, Jesus did not make promises of riches in this life. As a matter of fact, Jesus actually said that those who had it good here were entering the afterlife with a deficit (Luke 6:20–26). It seems plain and simple in the verses, so how then did we get so far off track from the OG Jesus that the prosperity gospel took hold?
They are twisting the scriptures, obviously! That classic move used for generations.
Anyone who is familiar with the prosperity gospel has heard these two verses, “For I know the plans I have for you,’ declares the Lord, ‘plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future (Jeremiah 29:11.)” and “Jabez cried out to the God of Israel, ‘Oh, that you would bless me and enlarge my territory!” (1 Chronicles 4:10).
So, on the one hand, we have Jesus saying, “if you’re rich on earth, you’re a jerk,” and on the other hand, we have these two verses talking about increasing wealth. What is the disconnect?
Context.
When evaluating a verse, the person teaching is supposed to know if it has universal or non-universal application. Meaning, “was this being spoken to all people, a specific people, or one person.” That changes the context of a scripture quite a bit. An example of a universal application would be, say, the Ten Commandments or the Beatitudes. A non-universal application would be verses about Jesus cursing fig trees. You are allowed to like figs, and you don’t have to curse fig trees just because Jesus did when he was hangry. And you certainly don’t have to walk around with protest signs screaming, “God Hates Figs.”
Most of the verses used by prosperity gospel ministers are ones that do not have universal application. These are verses telling the story of a specific situation, and more importantly, they aren’t about individual wealth. In both of the examples I used above, we are talking about the expansion of Kingdoms, not individuals. It is believed that Jabez is a decedent of the Kings of Judah, and Jeremiah is prophesying about the future prosperity of Jerusalem. The people of Jerusalem had been sent into exile, and Jeremiah sent a letter of hope to the elders and priests.
None of these verses are about individuals seeking personal wealth but about communities growing together.
Basically, even if these verses did have universal application and they meant that God was going to give wealth to everyone who believed… it would mean it was communal in nature. If that were the case, we would have to reinstitute things like the Year of Jubilee (debt forgiveness, Leviticus 25:1–4, 8–10) and making sure that all businesses left enough goods aside for those that couldn’t afford it (Leviticus 23:22.)
And before you get all mad at me for adding a socialist agenda to the Bible, you may want actually to read the book for yourself. Because I’m not the one who said, “it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.” (Matthew 19:21-24)
Jesus is a complicated character: the homeless king. What does it look like to live in the kingdom of a man who prefers riding around on donkeys and sleeps outside instead of in a palace? He’s turning the whole idea of what it means to rule on its head. He’s not demeaning to his subjects, instead he’s offering them food, healthcare, and a new way to understand the concept of home.
Blessed are the poor was not some cute catch phrase to put on t-shirts, he was turning the entire system on its head. He was promising a new way of life. One where the oppressed has freedom and opportunity.
In Luke’s version, Jesus said, “What sorrow awaits you who are praised by the crowds, for their ancestors also praised false prophet.” The evangelical church has replaced Jesus with a golden calf. We want the easy way out. The Ayn Rand gospel of selfishness and rugged individualism. But the Jesus of the gospel is telling us over and over again that it is through community and caring that we will find the real kingdom.
The evangelical church has replaced Jesus with a golden calf. I thought that very thing when they brought that giant gold trump statue out at cpac or wherever it was. You give me hope that there are enough of us that can still see. Thank you, Father.
I read this to my husband, and he jumped up and said "Thank you!" He appreciates your writings and interpretation and it causes him to look things up (he's actually an Elder at a Presbyterian church that's in the process of closing).